There’s a good article from the San Francisco Chronicle that discusses the grim future for California state parks and their hiking trails in the wake of the defeat of Proposition 21:
State officials vowed Wednesday to do everything they can to prevent California’s chronically underfunded state parks from turning into litter-filled wastelands full of stray dogs, transients, bonfires, weaponry and pot.
That sorry state of affairs could still be in the future, though, after the rejection of a ballot measure that would have added $18 to the amount Californians pay to license their vehicles.
And here’s a press release from the California State Parks Foundation, one of the sponsors of Proposition 21:
SAN FRANCISCO – The California State Parks Foundation (CSPF) extends its gratitude to park supporters across the state for putting Prop 21 on the November ballot, and the millions of California voters who supported the measure. While it is deeply disappointed that the initiative did not pass this year, CSPF cannot overlook the incredible, groundbreaking effort that put this measure before voters.
“We are saddened that Prop 21 did not pass,” said Elizabeth Goldstein, president of CSPF. “But we recognize that it was a challenging, noisy election that faced voters this year. We know that Californians do want to see a long-term solution for their state parks. The electorate’s reaction to this negative and cluttered election should not be taken as a referendum on the importance of state parks or the conservation and environmental needs of our state.”
The damage that has been done to state parks through decades of budget neglect will continue and take years to fix. As it is, the state budget that was put in place in October, a whopping 100 days late, is expected to continue the partial closures of 60 state parks and deep service reductions at another 90 parks.
“Our state parks are still at enormous risk from declining budgets,” said Goldstein. “We will not be giving up on finding long-term, reliable funding to protect and preserve these precious resources. CSPF will continue to fight in order to preserve our natural and cultural history for generations to come.”
In addition to draconian budget challenges, state parks continue to be threatened with proposals that are inconsistent with the mission of California’s state parks. CSPF, along with its partners, will keep fighting against these proposals that continue to have significant impacts on sensitive natural and cultural resources in the state park system.
CSPF expects to work with Governor Jerry Brown’s new administration in Sacramento to ensure that the devastating proposals of the previous administration—exemplified by park closures and service reductions—are not repeated. Clearly, millions of Californians want to see a future for their parks that embodies excellence. CSPF will continue its fight to keep parks open and accessible and to enhance the state parks experience for CSPF members and all Californians.
Your Take?
What future do you predict for California’s state parks? What are good solutions to the crisis?
Interesting that the Chronicle was one of the only newspapers in California to recommend NO on Prop 21 http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-09-15/opinion/24003620_1_state-parks-parks-and-wildlife-conservation-park-users
Yeah, I was house-sitting in San Francisco in October, so I read the Chronicle’s position. I voted for 21, but I wish we could adequately take care of the parks with the state’s general fund instead. The car license tax is a flat tax in which all vehicle owners pay the same amount regardless of their income or wealth.
I work for the State Park Service in Florida and it has taken an extreme amount of effort to keep that system afloat. The annual entrance passes were almost doubled in 2009 as well as raising general admission fees. And it looks like it might get more grim as our newly elected governor has stated that he plans to reduce the “state” workforce budget by 5%. State employees include park rangers and state troopers…. now who do you think is going to loose their job? That’s right, Ranger Smith. And I understand that California is in a much worse predicament. It’s unfortunate and it is really going to take the lovers of California State Parks to rally together and tell their government to take better care of it’s state parks. Now we just need someone to be the leader and instigator of this rally…. Any takers?
Brittany, thanks for sharing the dire Florida situation with us. I think a lot of the problem across the country with state park budgets is the depleted government coffers from this major economic downturn. When the economy starts growing strongly again, we may see a bit more money for state parks. Even then, many states, and certainly California, have tens of millions or more in deferred maintenance.