I want a new camera for hiking and backpacking.
Why? I have a 10 MP Sony DSLR A100 with a 28-300 zoom lens, but it’s heavy and bulky and I frequently don’t want to lug it with me.
I need a small and lightweight camera with high resolution that offers me many options, one that I’ll actually take on the trail.
Specifically, I need:
- high resolution, 10 MP or greater
- many settings for different photographic situations
- good zoom capability, from wide angle to moderate telephoto
- light weight
- high quality
The Camera to Beat
Canon PowerShot G11 10MP Digital Camera
Mark Stensaas, owner of Shasta View Gifts in Weed and a well-known outdoors photographer, recommended the Canon PowerShot G11 10 MP camera to me as the best compromise between portability and the ability to take high-quality pictures with a lot of flexibility. (Note: that’s an affiliate link to Amazon.)
Here are details from Amazon:
- New 10-megapixel High Sensitivity System; DIGIC 4 Image Processor
- Bright 2.8-inch Vari-Angle PureColor System LCD plus optical viewfinder
- Wide-angle 5x optical zoom (equivalent to 28-140mm); Canon’s Optical Image Stabilizer
- Improved Smart AUTO intelligently selects from 22 predefined shooting situations
- RAW + JPEG shooting and recording modes; capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
- 4 GB Secure Digital HC Memory Card
- Hi-Speed SD USB 2.0 Card Reader
- Compact Deluxe Gadget Bag for Photo/Video
- Three Piece Lens Cleaning Kit and Mini Tripod
Plus it only weighs 12.5 ounces, less than a pound.
It’s a Bit Pricy
It costs $489. I can pay that price if it’s truly worth it and serves my needs, but I’d rather spend less, as long as I get a high-quality camera that does everything I want.
My Questions For You…
Do you use this camera? Do you like it? Anything similar you would recommend instead?
{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
I was on a similar search about six months ago and ended up with a Panasonic DMC-LX3, my first departure from Nikon. I’m very pleased with this camera, mostly due to the incredible sensor (holy dynamic range batman). The wide shot capability is also a big plus because of all the backpacking I do in the sierra where I don’t want to carry my Nikon D90 and corresponding lens(es). I don’t want to miss those big expansive views!
I wrote up an initial impressions post about it after my first outing – maybe I should get around to a followup post now.
http://calipidder.com/wp/2009/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx3-digital-camera-first-impressions/
Rebecca gives a strong thumbs up for the Panasonic DMC-LX3. Go to her excellent hiking blog via her link above to see what she thinks, and to see the beautiful photos she took.
And then check her other excellent posts and subscribe to her blog.
I carry a G11 and love it. The photos are excellent and it has every function you will need. Battery life is great. The size can be a bit of a problem but it fits perfectly into my hip pocket on my osprey kestrel 48. I put a tripod mount on the bottom and clip a mini beaner on that to clip to my day pack on the lashing points. But I guess that would work with any camera. On the following link any of the hiking photos have been done with the G11. A few were done with a DSLR but mostly my G11.
http://www.picasaweb.com/jesse.r.zamora
Good luck.
Jesse, thanks for your opinion. You’ve got some cool and crisp shots on Picasaweb.
Another vote for the G11!
I also have a G11 and love it. The only drawback is missing some wildlife shots, but being able to hike with a much smaller camera (shaved pounds!) and a smaller camera bag (The Mountainsmith Cyber II Large Recycled is perfect!) has been great. I even got a second Cyber II for my Flip Video and iPhone.
All of my photos since December have been from the G11.
Derek, I’m glad you dig the G11. I’m also concerned about the limited telephoto ability.
I really like your site and good luck with your book. Let me know when it’s out.
Oh yea, and the ability to still shoot RAW pics has been essential. As stated above, the battery also lasts forever. And the camera feels rock solid.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/100peaks
http://www.100peaks.com/photos/
I also wrote a review, too:
http://www.100peaks.com/2010/01/26/canon-powershot-g11-digital-camera-gear-review/
Hope this helps!
Thanks again Derek.
Just followed you on Twitter. I’m @TheJohnSoares.
I have done a lot of backpacking & climbing and taken a lot of cameras weird places. First of all, as soon as you drop to a compact or sub-compact camera you are going to stick yourself with a smaller sensor, so your low-light noise is going to go up. For backpacking though a lot of shots are in great light so this is not as big an issue. Of course, this all depends on what and how you are shooting. I HIGHLY recommend the Panasonic ZS series. I have the ZS1 and just bought the upgraded Zs7. These cameras have Leica lenses, weigh about 30% less than that Canon and have a WIDER angle lens (25-300mm in 35mm equiv). They have excellent lens characteristics throughout the range. The newer Zs7 also has a built-in GPS (can eat batteries faster) to geotag your photos. Also note that you will need a Panasonic brand spare battery, won’t take generics. I have often gone into the backcountry with 2 fully charged batteries and easily taken 300+ photos without battery problems. I have owned about 5 Panasonic Lumix cameras for my pocket/travel camera and they are hard to beat. Oh yeah, about $200 cheaper than that Canon too! Do you really need an external hotshoe in the back country? I agree, that Canon feels nice, built well and is a super sexy camera, but for the money and end flexibility, choose the Panasonic. Check out dpreview.com, they have the most comprehensive reviews of both cameras. (If they don’t have a full review of the Zs7 up yet, just pick one of the other ZS series as they are all the same, the Zs7 just has fancier electronics). I should mentioned the new electronics on the Zs7 double the hand shake stabilization though and much faster focus and power up time! Good luck! Email me for any questions!!
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sidebyside.asp
Noel, thanks for expanding my choices with this detailed recommendation.
I want to be sure I get the best camera possible, but I obviously need to do the research.
Beautiful blog…
The Canon is a beautiful camera. I think in the end it just comes down to what feels best in your hand and what you will pull out and use. The big benefit for that camera is the low pixel density on the chip and the ability to save raw images.
When I travelled with 4×5 cameras, nice SLR’s and my little Leica M6 I noticed that with a lot of my travelling though that I ended up keeping more pictures from the Leica than anything. I think that was just because it was smaller, I carried it more often, was more likely to pull it out to shoot a scene and just loved the way it felt in my hand. The Panasonic Lumix is really the best compromise in all avenues I think. I really use wide angle and if Canon could make that lens a 24-200 I think I would seriously consider returning to that slightly larger, heavier camera.
I just found your blog and just moved to Northern California, so I look forward to reading more!
Noel Hastings´s last blog ..Homeostasis
Noel, that’s my number-one priority: will I actually bring and use the camera?
And welcome to northern California. I think it’s one of the most beautiful and diverse regions on the planet.
Just FYI: I just received my new upgrade to the ZS1, the Lumix ZS7. Had a few notes to add to my previous post. First, the newer ZS7 is lighter and has slightly better design to control placement, a better LCD and much faster CPU. Although my previous post said it would not take aftermarket batteries, mine works fine with my aftermarket battery. As far as images, I did a quick comparison and both extremes (at 25mm and 300mm) between my ZS1 and my ZS7. Although the pixel density is higher in the ZS7 I did not see the increased noise I was worried about. Actually, the new CPU and hardware not only speed everything up, but the image processing is much better even with that bigger, denser chip! Seemingly improved contrast range, JPG compression and less noise overall with nice resolution. These chips are still not the best in really low light compared to larger chips, but I was happy. With the ZS7 you get a GPS, a lighter body, better anti-shake, faster focus (very fast) and a better images compared to the ZS1.
I am heading out Thursday night to find a decent hike to try it out. Now to find some mountains without slushy snow (I am looking at your book now!!) Let me know if you want any more info on the ZS7 and I will quit hammering your blog with this stuff. -noel
Noel Hastings´s last blog ..The End of Intern Year
Noel, thanks for all the detailed info about the ZS7. I still haven’t made my decision, so feel free to keep putting more details on this post.
The ZS7 sounds like a very good camera…
I think you should stay with the Sony A100 and use a wide zoom lens as your primary lens (18mm – 70mm). I’m assuming the A100 has a larger sensor than a point-and-shoot (Canon Powershot G11). The bigger sensor make a huge difference shooting in low-light. I carry a Canon Rebel Xti with a 18mm-50mm lens. I don’t find it too heavy for hiking.
Ken´s last blog ..Escondido Falls (Malibu)
Ken, this is good advice. I’m still thinking about all my options. Just used the Sony A100 the other day and it really isn’t that heavy…
{ 1 trackback }